A corporate language academy adds more value when the training is adapted to the real needs of the business and geared to specific, measurable objectives. What mistakes do companies make when working with a corporate language academy? Choosing generic courses, not setting goals, ignoring how available the teams really are or not evaluating the results are all failings that reduce the impact of the training. Here is how to avoid them…

Many companies realise too late that their teams’ language training is not producing real results in daily work. What usually happens is that courses are bought without checking whether they truly answer the needs of the business, or without measuring the impact.

In this article we will look at the most common mistakes companies make when working with a corporate language academy and how to avoid them, so that the training delivers value and tangible results.

Mistake 1: choosing generic courses that are not adapted to the business context

One of the most frequent mistakes is buying standard courses with no connection to employees’ actual tasks. A general English course, for example, may improve someone’s grammar, but it does not prepare them for professional situations such as presenting projects, negotiating with clients or replying to formal emails.

In companies with highly technical teams, such as engineering or R&D, a generic course can be frustrating, because the vocabulary and the situations do not match the reality of the job.

To avoid this, it is advisable to work with an academy that designs bespoke programmes based on the real duties of each group or department.

Mistake 2: not setting clear objectives before the training starts

Another common mistake is to assume that “more training hours” equals better results. Without clear objectives, however, it is hard to measure whether the training is working.

What does the company want to achieve with the training? Better communication with international clients? Fewer mistakes when writing emails in another language? Equipping the sales team to negotiate in English?

Setting these objectives from the outset makes it possible to design a plan that delivers specific results and to measure the impact of the training.

Mistake 3: ignoring employees’ working situation when planning timetables

Language training should not get in the way of the company’s productivity. Many academies offer rigid timetable models that take no account of participants’ workload.

This usually leads to:

• poor attendance
• frequent cancellations
• a lack of commitment from employees

To avoid these problems, a corporate language academy has to be flexible and adapt the timetables to the teams’ real availability, combining in-person and online formats where necessary.

Mistake 4: not integrating the training with the company’s other language needs

Language training is only one part of what a company may need in linguistic terms. Many organisations also require translation services, document revision or support in communicating with foreign clients.

If the training plan does not take these aspects into account, you lose the chance to put in place an integrated language strategy that strengthens both employees’ knowledge and the quality of external communication.

On this point, it is useful to look at resources analysing how to choose language providers and how to avoid the usual mistakes when contracting translation and training services, in the article on https://alosidiomas.com/errores-externalizar-traducciones-empresa/, which offers useful criteria for B2B companies.

Mistake 5: not evaluating or measuring the results of the training

Once the training is under way, many companies do not systematically track participants’ progress or compare the results against the objectives they set.

Without an evaluation system, it is hard to know whether the training is effective or whether it needs adjusting.

Some recommended practices include:

• periodic level assessments
• satisfaction surveys
• metrics linked to business indicators (for example, fewer mistakes in emails written in another language, or more effective international meetings)

This kind of tracking makes it possible to take informed decisions about continuing, adjusting or expanding the language programmes.

Common situations that reveal mistakes in language training

Technical teams that do not apply what they have learned

An industrial company found that, after months of English training, its engineers were still asking for translations to communicate with foreign suppliers. The problem was not their general level but the fact that the course content included neither technical terminology nor day-to-day situations.

A more personalised approach, aligned with their actual responsibilities, would have avoided the problem.

Management that sees no visible results

At another company, management decided to suspend part of the training because it could see no tangible results. The cause was the lack of defined objectives: nobody had established which metrics to measure or how to assess the impact on the business.

Setting objectives from the outset helps demonstrate the return on the training investment.

 

Frequently asked questions

Hiring a corporate language academy can be a strategic investment to improve your organisation’s communication and competitiveness. But avoiding common mistakes such as generic courses, a lack of objectives or no evaluation is key to getting real results.

If your company wants to design an effective language plan aligned with its needs, at ALOS we can help you assess your situation and design bespoke language training programmes. Get in touch for more information and a personalised analysis.

Let’s design your training →